<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Firearm and Caliber: Ruger SP101 Chambered for the 327 Federal Magnum Cartridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/</link>
	<description>Police Training and Officer Safety Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Humphries</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-12419</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Humphries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-12419</guid>
		<description>I sincerely hope that the .327 mag fairs better than the H&amp;R mag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sincerely hope that the .327 mag fairs better than the H&amp;R mag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-11558</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-11558</guid>
		<description>yes there is no big deal about a six shooter in medium to large frame revovers. the big deal is that you can have six man stopping rounds in a small frame revolver. note to john nau who posted above. this round will kill the largest of men on pcp. i promise. lights out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes there is no big deal about a six shooter in medium to large frame revovers. the big deal is that you can have six man stopping rounds in a small frame revolver. note to john nau who posted above. this round will kill the largest of men on pcp. i promise. lights out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-11172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-11172</guid>
		<description>I think that the .327 Federal Magnum is the future. It has more power than the .38 and more muzzle velocity than the .357. 

A Gun chambered in .327 Federal Magnum will also fire .32 ACP .32 S&amp;W .32 S&amp;W Long .32 H&amp;R Magnum making five different round’s usable in one Gun. The beauty here is that target practice with the lower powered rounds will keep you from soaking your hand in a bucket of ice after a day of shooting.

The price of the .32 ammo will probably come down if popularity gains for this round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the .327 Federal Magnum is the future. It has more power than the .38 and more muzzle velocity than the .357. </p>
<p>A Gun chambered in .327 Federal Magnum will also fire .32 ACP .32 S&amp;W .32 S&amp;W Long .32 H&amp;R Magnum making five different round’s usable in one Gun. The beauty here is that target practice with the lower powered rounds will keep you from soaking your hand in a bucket of ice after a day of shooting.</p>
<p>The price of the .32 ammo will probably come down if popularity gains for this round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viejo</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-11144</link>
		<dc:creator>Viejo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-11144</guid>
		<description>None of the 32 cal. ammo is cheap.  After considering availability and cost of ammo for a .327 magnum revolver, I have decided to continue using my 357mag/38spcl.  A variety of 38 special ammo is available and the price is not prohibative.  I use Federal P38MA rounds for home defense, 130 gr. FMJ for target, and 357 JHP for outdoors carry.  A 327 magnum would be nice for the Misses but she can continue to use my Bersa Thunder Ultra Compact 9 mm with C9BP loads for defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of the 32 cal. ammo is cheap.  After considering availability and cost of ammo for a .327 magnum revolver, I have decided to continue using my 357mag/38spcl.  A variety of 38 special ammo is available and the price is not prohibative.  I use Federal P38MA rounds for home defense, 130 gr. FMJ for target, and 357 JHP for outdoors carry.  A 327 magnum would be nice for the Misses but she can continue to use my Bersa Thunder Ultra Compact 9 mm with C9BP loads for defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floridakracker</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-10579</link>
		<dc:creator>floridakracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-10579</guid>
		<description>Why dont they just make a revolver with the 7.62x25 round? 1650 fps outta the CZ-52.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dont they just make a revolver with the 7.62&#215;25 round? 1650 fps outta the CZ-52.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-5454</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-5454</guid>
		<description>Art,

Ruger has not announced anything, but you are right.  The 327 in a single six would make for a nice small game gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art,</p>
<p>Ruger has not announced anything, but you are right.  The 327 in a single six would make for a nice small game gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: art</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-5438</link>
		<dc:creator>art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-5438</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if Ruger is planning on chambering the Single Six in 327 mag.? This caliber combo sounds like a great small game gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if Ruger is planning on chambering the Single Six in 327 mag.? This caliber combo sounds like a great small game gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carry Enough Gun: Just Say &#8216;No&#8217; to Mouseguns for Off-Duty and Back-Up</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-4110</link>
		<dc:creator>Carry Enough Gun: Just Say &#8216;No&#8217; to Mouseguns for Off-Duty and Back-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-4110</guid>
		<description>[...] possible exception to the &#8220;mousegun&#8221; calibers is the .327 Federal Magnum that was introduced earlier this year.  The .327 Magnum launches a .32 caliber bullet at much higher velocities than any of the previous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] possible exception to the &#8220;mousegun&#8221; calibers is the .327 Federal Magnum that was introduced earlier this year.  The .327 Magnum launches a .32 caliber bullet at much higher velocities than any of the previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a SP101  357 Mag  owner 2.5&quot;,  and I&#039;ve been reading up on the 327 Mag.  If your a recoil sensitive person I could see going with the 327 Mag for a SD firearm or back-up.  For me personally it&#039;s doesn&#039;t work , as I enjoy shooting my SP 101 357 and the recoil is no problem!  To me the 357 Mag give more versatility as for as bullet wt&#039;s. Definately better performace.  Now if and when this cartridge makes into  a lever gun then I might reconsider it as it would make a great plinker/varmit gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a SP101  357 Mag  owner 2.5&#8243;,  and I&#8217;ve been reading up on the 327 Mag.  If your a recoil sensitive person I could see going with the 327 Mag for a SD firearm or back-up.  For me personally it&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t work , as I enjoy shooting my SP 101 357 and the recoil is no problem!  To me the 357 Mag give more versatility as for as bullet wt&#8217;s. Definately better performace.  Now if and when this cartridge makes into  a lever gun then I might reconsider it as it would make a great plinker/varmit gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-1601</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-1601</guid>
		<description>I purchased one of these some months back, and FINALLY laid my hands on some ammo.  I must say, I was sceptical, but thought it might be worth a try and hopefully actually performs as claimed.  Well, after test firing into wet phone books, it achieved an honest 18&quot; of penetration, and bullet performance was that typical of a large bore magnum.  Accuracy was very good.  Impressed?  Yes indeed-I have no doubt this round will do very well-I hope the non-believers out there will give it a chance.  Finally, we have a TRUE 32 caliber MAGNUM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased one of these some months back, and FINALLY laid my hands on some ammo.  I must say, I was sceptical, but thought it might be worth a try and hopefully actually performs as claimed.  Well, after test firing into wet phone books, it achieved an honest 18&#8243; of penetration, and bullet performance was that typical of a large bore magnum.  Accuracy was very good.  Impressed?  Yes indeed-I have no doubt this round will do very well-I hope the non-believers out there will give it a chance.  Finally, we have a TRUE 32 caliber MAGNUM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>I bought this gun in March.  I liked it a lot until the ejection rod jumped the track and I had to send it back to Ruger.  It&#039;s been a month and I  have not gotten it back.  I put about 400 rounds through it.  The full power magnum rounds were a bit hard to extract unless you keep the cylinder pretty clean.  Accurate and fun to shoot in .32 H&amp;R, .32 Long, and .32 S&amp;W.  The lower power federal hydra-shok in .327 magnum were easy to shoot.  The full power stuff is a bit snappy, but very accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this gun in March.  I liked it a lot until the ejection rod jumped the track and I had to send it back to Ruger.  It&#8217;s been a month and I  have not gotten it back.  I put about 400 rounds through it.  The full power magnum rounds were a bit hard to extract unless you keep the cylinder pretty clean.  Accurate and fun to shoot in .32 H&amp;R, .32 Long, and .32 S&amp;W.  The lower power federal hydra-shok in .327 magnum were easy to shoot.  The full power stuff is a bit snappy, but very accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>i recently bought a .327 and it is a great light gun to shoot but the rounds are expensive. i would rather take a .22 or .38 spl. out for fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i recently bought a .327 and it is a great light gun to shoot but the rounds are expensive. i would rather take a .22 or .38 spl. out for fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Nau</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>John Nau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-636</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the big surprise is about being able to load 6 shots into the .327 magnum vise 5 rounds into the .38 Special or .357 Magnum.  Doesn&#039;t anyone remember the term&#039; &quot;six shooter&quot;.  They are not uncommon and I have and have had several 6 shot revolvers in the aforementioned calibers.  WHAT&#039;S THE BIG DEAL???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the big surprise is about being able to load 6 shots into the .327 magnum vise 5 rounds into the .38 Special or .357 Magnum.  Doesn&#8217;t anyone remember the term&#8217; &#8220;six shooter&#8221;.  They are not uncommon and I have and have had several 6 shot revolvers in the aforementioned calibers.  WHAT&#8217;S THE BIG DEAL???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randy cornman</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>randy cornman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-610</guid>
		<description>Taurus needs to return to the 3&quot; barrel length.  I tried to tell them a couple years ago.  The extra inch does not reduce concealability but adds to the ballistic performance, of .22 mag or .327 mag.  But 3&quot; is definitely more concealable than 4&quot;.  I will NOT buy a .22 mag or .327 mag. with a 2&quot; barrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taurus needs to return to the 3&#8243; barrel length.  I tried to tell them a couple years ago.  The extra inch does not reduce concealability but adds to the ballistic performance, of .22 mag or .327 mag.  But 3&#8243; is definitely more concealable than 4&#8243;.  I will NOT buy a .22 mag or .327 mag. with a 2&#8243; barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2007/11/14/new-firearm-and-caliber-ruger-sp101-chambered-for-the-327-federal-magnum-cartridge/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>The new Federal .327 Mag sounds nice - and the SP101 is great as well - I own one.  Yes it only has 5 shot capability for .357Mag, .38 Sp, &amp; 38Sp.+ and is a pleasure to shoot, yes  six rounds might be better than 5. However I also own a couple S&amp;W&#039;s and a Titianum Tauraus 7 shot that will also handle all the above .38 &amp; 357 loads, and it is only 25 oz&#039;s loaded.  Now the 158 grain .357 mags will jolt me a bit and I do have to give my hand a rest after 50 - 75 rounds but that is acceptable. I can always switch to one of my other firearms the 1911, or the CZ .40 to rest up for the next round of .357 mag.  shooting.

As a new gun owner it might be great starter pistol option however I already own many weapons  and do not see the justification of $20.00 for 20 rounds as smart.  Yet one could also choose the Taurus 22 Mag 8 shot revolver that has almost no recoil and if you are defending yourself against only humans it is more than sufficient to use for self defense,and it has 8 shots available.
However in the wilderness especially in bear country I want nothing less that a .44 ma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Federal .327 Mag sounds nice &#8211; and the SP101 is great as well &#8211; I own one.  Yes it only has 5 shot capability for .357Mag, .38 Sp, &amp; 38Sp.+ and is a pleasure to shoot, yes  six rounds might be better than 5. However I also own a couple S&amp;W&#8217;s and a Titianum Tauraus 7 shot that will also handle all the above .38 &amp; 357 loads, and it is only 25 oz&#8217;s loaded.  Now the 158 grain .357 mags will jolt me a bit and I do have to give my hand a rest after 50 &#8211; 75 rounds but that is acceptable. I can always switch to one of my other firearms the 1911, or the CZ .40 to rest up for the next round of .357 mag.  shooting.</p>
<p>As a new gun owner it might be great starter pistol option however I already own many weapons  and do not see the justification of $20.00 for 20 rounds as smart.  Yet one could also choose the Taurus 22 Mag 8 shot revolver that has almost no recoil and if you are defending yourself against only humans it is more than sufficient to use for self defense,and it has 8 shots available.<br />
However in the wilderness especially in bear country I want nothing less that a .44 ma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.493 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-19 15:17:02 -->

