Federal v. Remington .308 Ammo Comparison: One Sniper’s View
By
If you are a part of the law enforcement marksman (sniper) community then any discussion on ammunition selection will almost exclusively focus on the .308 caliber, 168-grain Match King boat tail hollow point (BTHP) cartridge. The 2007 American Sniper Association Annual Report cited the .308 caliber, 168-grain Match King BTHP as being the “preferred ammunition” for police marksmen “based primarily on its accuracy and consistency”. The Federal Gold Medal cartridge has, for many, been the preferred police marksman cartridge. This cartridge produces consistent match grade quality with the convenience of being factory made.
However, with the current state of the economy, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the uncertainty felt by many Americans about the Administration’s views on the 2nd Amendment, a shortage of ammunition of all calibers and types has occurred. This drain on the available ammunition supply has caught many police departments and individuals off guard and has required them to reevaluate ammunition selection and training requirements to accommodate the circumstances faced by all.
Although Remington has a great reputation of making quality ammunition, police marksmen and professional shooters tend to take their ammunition selection more seriously than the casual hobby shooter or hunter. When a fraction of an inch, in less than desirable shooting circumstances means the difference between a threat eliminated and an innocent life endangered, the demand for consistent accuracy to the most strenuous of measures must win out to the budgetary concerns of the bean counters. That’s my humble opinion anyway. To that end many who have allegiance to the Federal Gold Medal cartridge would be very wary to consider a replacement.
Remington’s counter to the Federal Gold Medal cartridge is their Premier Match 168-grain Match King BTHP. The Premier Match cartridge uses the same Sierra Match King bullet as the Federal Gold Medal cartridge. The Sierra brand bullets are considered by many law enforcement and military shooters to be the best match grade bullets anywhere in the world. To some (even among police officers), if the bullet is the same, the cartridge is the same. However, to the police marksman and professional shooter what goes around and behind the bullet has just as much to do with its accuracy and performance as the bullet itself. Remington and Federal both use their own high quality new brass casings made with stringent manufacturing controls to ensure proper fit and consistent tolerance during firing. Remington and Federal use their own primers and powder, but the exact formula and amount of powder is not made public. If there are going to be any differences in ballistics or performance, this is where they will be found.
I searched for information on each cartridge from the web site of the prospective manufacturer. The differences between these two very similar cartridges at 100 yards are almost non-existent on paper. The printed information actually shows that the Remington cartridge out-performs the Federal cartridge just slightly. The Remington bullet is capable of traveling at 2680 ft/sec with 2678 lb/ft of energy at 100 yards, whereas the Federal bullet is traveling a little slower at 2460 ft/sec with 2257 lb/ft of energy. Either round still packs a powerful punch at 100 yards. What is the effect on trajectory? Using a zero-point of 100 yards the difference is very minimal between the two cartridges. At 200 yards the Remington bullet drops -4.1 inches to the Federal bullet’s -4.3 inches. At 300 yards the difference broadens ever so slightly as the Remington bullet has dropped -14.7 inches and the Federal bullet has dropped -15.3 inches, or approximately a half inch difference.
Having faced a mandatory change in ammunition from Federal to Remington our marksmen put the Remington Premier Match cartridge to the test. What we found was that the Remington cartridge was between one and three MOA off target at 100 yards from the zero-point established for each rifle using the Federal Gold Medal cartridge. In other words, from point of aim our marksmen’s shots were one to three inches off target. Each marksman was fairly consistently off to the left and slightly high of point of aim. This was verified on several cold bore shots to eliminate the possibility of operator error. Once this was established each shooter adjusted their scope to reflect the new zero point and a new cold bore shot was taken. Having adjusted to the slight differences between the Remington cartridge and the Federal cartridge our shooters were able to sustain consistent cold bore shots within one half MOA at 100 yards. Further testing at ranges of up to 300 yards has produced consistent MOA shots using the Remington cartridge.
In conclusion, if you find yourself faced with the prospect of changing precision cartridges from the Federal Gold Medal to the Remington Premier Match, you can rest assured that the Remington brand will live up to the traditions of quality that they have become known for. Using proper shooting techniques, along with a slightly adjusted zero point, the Remington 700 fired its name sake’s ammunition with no problems, and produced the type of accuracy that is demanded by police marksmen and professional shooter’s alike. The difference in velocity, energy, and trajectory begins to broaden between the two cartridges the further the distance of the shot. However, the American Sniper Association 2007 report on nearly 20 years of police-involved shootings shows an average distance of the police marksman shot at 54 yards. At that distance either cartridge is going to have a very precise impact with devastating results.
Ed. Note: Aaron is a police sergeant with a mid-sized agency in a major US metro-area. Aaron has a diverse set of skills in patrol, traffic enforcement, drug recognition, undercover narcotics, supervision and SWAT. We hope to have more contributions from him in the future.




2 Comments
January 26th, 2010 at 5:37 pm
Aaron,
Bravo mate! Well spoken like a true professional behind the crosshairs!
Too much emphasis is placed on the color and name on the outside of the box instead of the splatter the bullet creates from the suspect at our average ranges of 100-200 yds.
Keep up the journalism…about time we had some truth on the net!
March 9th, 2010 at 4:41 pm
I agree with 90% of what the author states. The biggest gripe I have is with not being able to load my own. I cannot understand why courts lawers and government agencies find this practice to be a liability. Loading your own would 1. Drasticaly cut costs to the agencies. 2. Allow more practice and qualifications per year. 3. Give the operator far more flexability in the loads they create allowing the oporator to construct ammo for certain purposes adding to their flexability. In these times we live in price and availability is of utmost importance. We in the Law Enforcement community should allow reloading as an accepted alternative to production ammunition.