Lawyers defending violent offenders may be more likely to try to introduce brain science into their cases after research recently reported from the University of Utah.
In what the NY Times calls “the most rigorous study to date of how behavioral biology can sway judicial decisions,” three researchers from Salt Lake City asked 181 state trial judges from across the US to read a hypothetical case (based on an actual crime) of a psychopath who was convicted of beating a restaurant manager senseless with the butt of a gun during a robbery attempt and leaving him with permanent brain damage. The defendant had a history of committing aggressive acts “without showing empathy.”






















